Goodbye

would you prefer i be honest and be rude or I lie and be passive agressive

1 Like

Sorry to see you go gbt, hope the best. Also when I return I hopefully will get that build done :smiley:

Hope your success on HM translates to irl as long as you dont become a criminal there too lol.

See ya!

2 Likes

Well have fun whatever you’re going to do next, good riddance my fellow Socialist best friend :heartbeat:

wouldn’t be proper forum post fight without chicken popping up on his 1759th alt

5 Likes

Moosh,
If you own anything that would make a good resort or hotel please consider donating it to Palm.

1 Like

I don’t want anything from ya but man I hope you come back. Don’t go forever.

1 Like

Considering all these bans and punishments, you still left a positive mark on me and a whole bunch of other people too, bravo! (I don’t know how or why) but its just true. I hope to see you again in 130 days bouss

i hope to see him sooner, allowing easyplace really should be reconsidered and i’ve listed my reasons to a staff member (mostly because i don’t think “gameplay mechanics” and what we consider is “too fast” should be in the way of benefits throughout the economy, the construction sector, the job market, etc.)

2 Likes

I don’t think easyplace is such a good idea. It wont benefit the economy it will just make things that were already gonna be built faster. Therefore giving people less stuff to do. If anything I think it will kill the building industry because property owners would just build things themself when it is really quick and easy.

2 Likes

easyplace should benefit the economy. more things wod be built, more money would be spent on materials, people would spend their time on HM not just building but rather doing something else. it’s a more efficient use of time and people would get less bored playing, it would allow for more projects to start, projects that could potentially increase activity. it would allow for more money to flow, people to spend more. instead of building something little, a person may choose to build something big as they now can. that big build would cost more to make but would be easier to

do. designers/builders/demolishers would all have more to do, more money flowing

it won’t mean there’s “less stuff to do”, it’s the same amount of stuff but the building is faster, which isn’t necessarily bad. if people are only playing because they’re building something, it really shows the state of our server.

it would not kill the building industry. Liteworks and Agora Build have both shown their interest in allowing easyplace as very few people actually want to build. this would fix that issue. there will always be a demand for building companies as some don’t have the time or the mod to build what they want to build, especially for bigger projects. the market would finally reach an equilibrium where demand and supply would be the same, instead of a shortage where demand is high and supply is low. yes, some would choose to build it on their own, and that would lower the demand a bit to a more acceptable level, not everyone would do it though and that’s why the industry would benefit from it.

1 Like

I disagree. When things are so super easy to build property owners would just build stuff themself. The building industry would take a large dip in projects and each project would earn less money then before. I don’t think it would make people more likely to build bigger things, instead it would just make stuff that was already going to be built, built faster. Seeing as the building industry is one of the few remaining profitable industries I think we need to be careful not to kill it. My point is there will be less buildings to build for liteworks and each project would pay much less. The profit margins would be even slimmer. Making large projects would be not worth the time.

2 Likes

not all property owners. remember that not everyone has litematica and not everyone has time. the building industry would still fill in that gap. people nowadays could use litematica themselves and build stuff, but they don’t, they prefer to spend that extra money to save on time. now yes, it would make building faster, but surely with faster built times people can upscale? it’s not impossible that people would build more and that people would stop wasting time just building.

liteworks would have less buildings to build, sure, but as 1. someone who’s owned liteworks and 2. someone who can see whats going on in liteworks, it’s clear that there’s more demand than there is supply.

the industry would balance out. with easyplace, people would be less willing to use building companies, sure. this causes a reduction in prices. with a reduction in prices, the demand for building companies goes up. with the allowance of easyplace we would also see more staff. therefore, the industry would be in an equilibrium where the industry is most profitable - more builders, more tickets being finished, tickets remaining somewhat the same (as demand will fall, but with lower prices, demand would climb again). yes, building is profitable, but that’s because of the immensly inflated prices to get something built. little people want to do it. demand is high, supply is low

now consider this — the demolition sector would flourish. with new buildings that would potentially be built, there would be more to demolish. there most likely would be new buildings as people would be more likely to build. the options now are that you either build it yourself and waste your time, or you hire a building company with the inflated prices due to the lack of supply of builders and high demand.

allowing easyplace is also supported by some owners of Agora Build and all previous owners of Liteworks (including me). if it had any chances of ruining the industry, we wouldn’t support it.

making large projects would more definitely be worth the time, i don’t know what you exactly mean by that but it would reduce the hours spent building and doing nothing genuinely productive. profit margins wouldn’t be slimmer. it’s either you use a building company (where it would be slightly cheaper) or you build it yourself/with a group (where it would now take less time)

2 Likes

Yeah honestly even if I had easy place I would still hire out all my building xD wouldn’t effect me at all I agree with you.

1 Like

I’d do the same honestly, having builders is still much more convenient, saves me time (from building and getting materials), and for big projects, it would be massively more convenient to have an extra hand or more builders working on it. easyplace can save on time but it certainly won’t kill the industry

edit: sorry gbt for changing the discussion in this topic, it is in hopes to legalise the very thing that got you banned though, i’m aiming for a reconsideration on the decision made by staff on keeping it punishable

1 Like

This should be allowed but only for building companys.

Why would we restrict it to building companies? What is the point?

4 Likes

Yeah that makes no sense.

2 Likes

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WE LOST ANOTHER ONE

Can I ask why you are necroposting?

1 Like